From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <463AE925.30204@domain.hid>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 10:04:53 +0200
From: Johan Borkhuis <j.borkhuis@domain.hid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4639D724.5010702@domain.hid>
	<DD39B5C3F4963040ADC9768BE7E430CB01E43D41@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <DD39B5C3F4963040ADC9768BE7E430CB01E43D41@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Latency calculation and test
List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai
	<xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help>,
	<mailto:xenomai-help-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-help>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-help-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help>,
	<mailto:xenomai-help-request@domain.hid>
To: Daniel Schnell <daniel.schnell@domain.hid>
Cc: Xenomai-help@domain.hid

Daniel Schnell wrote:
> Johan,
>
> If I am not very wrong, you should have plenty experiences with VxWorks (Maintainer of VxWorks FAQ ?). So if you have the correct timing measurements for Xenomai, could you make similar tests on your board with VxWorks, just to have a comparision ? I understand that this comparision is not fair, but I think people can better see, where Xenomai is currently standing.
>   
No you are not wrong, but I am afraid I don't have a working BSP and 
development environment for this board. I agree that it would be a good 
comparison though.

Kind regards,
    Johan Borkhuis