All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
	Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] boot bzImages under paravirt
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 08:15:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <463B4E12.50703@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1ps5gslfm.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>

Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ok.  Although we can hoist the bss zeroing, if everything needs it.
>   

It will if we're booting out of bzImage; the bss won't be clear in that
case.

> Hmm.  I'm wondering about the segment reload and how much of a problem
> that is.  My memory says that segment reloads are not actually a
> privileged operation, so we may be able to support this even in
> paravirt mode.  How hard would that be to support?  The segment
> we reload is a fixed part of our boot protocol.
>   

The problem is not the reloads themselves, but what you're reloading
them with.  If we come up under Xen, then it will provide a default GDT
and pre-load the segments with flat 4G(-ish) selectors - but the
selectors won't be the normal Linux ones.

So if we reload using a constant selector, then that will break under
Xen. But if we do a:

    mov %cs, %eax
    mov %eax, %ds
    // etc

sequence then it should be fine.  This will work even for loading %ss,
since the %cs CPL will equal the RPL needed for %ss.

    J

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-04 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-04 12:59 [RFC PATCH 1/3] Replace paravirt_probe with "platform type" boot header field Rusty Russell
2007-05-04 13:02 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] lguest: Boot with virtual == physical to get closer to native Linux Rusty Russell
2007-05-04 13:07   ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] boot bzImages under paravirt Rusty Russell
2007-05-04 14:38     ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-04 14:55       ` Rusty Russell
2007-05-04 15:49         ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-04 15:15       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2007-05-04 15:45         ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-04 16:13           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-04 16:43             ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-04 16:57             ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-04 17:07               ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-04 17:30                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-04 18:22                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-04 18:48                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-04 18:55                       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-04 19:21                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-04 16:46         ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-04 17:25           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-04 17:27             ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-04 17:36             ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-04 17:44               ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-04 18:25               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-04 14:01 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] Replace paravirt_probe with "platform type" boot header field Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-04 14:18   ` Rusty Russell
2007-05-04 14:23     ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-04 15:52       ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-04 16:48         ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-04 17:13           ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-04 18:30             ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-04 18:55               ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-04 19:10                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-04 19:14                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-04 19:31                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-04 19:19                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-04 15:10     ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-04 15:53     ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=463B4E12.50703@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=zach@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.