From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pascal Hambourg Subject: Re: Simulating a "bad" connection. Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 23:55:40 +0200 Message-ID: <463BABDC.6000106@plouf.fr.eu.org> References: <200705042201.21985.tommy@svearike.sytes.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Hello, Jan Engelhardt a =E9crit : >=20 > -m statistic --mode random >=20 > It might not exist yet either. Indeed. The 'statistic' match was included in kernel 2.6.18 and requires=20 iptables >=3D 1.3.6. >>kernel: 2.6.16-rc5 >>iptables: 1.3.4 The 'random' match is supported by iptables 1.3.4, but not by the=20 standard kernel. It needs to be patched with the 'connlimit' patch which=20 used to be included in the patch-o-matic-ng snapshots until=20 patch-o-matic-ng-20060511. Unfortunately such old snapshots are not=20 available on the Netfilter main server any more. They may still be=20 available in some archives or mirrors out there. I think I kept a copy.