From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rafa=B3_Bilski?= Subject: Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 14:20:25 +0200 Message-ID: <463DC809.5080400@interia.pl> References: <200705042320.41278.dj@david-web.co.uk> <463C18C4.7030304@interia.pl> <5699f8f00705050144s5c00a455s8f7dba9258d83986@mail.gmail.com> <463CC380.3060603@interia.pl> <463CE1FB.4050305@interia.pl> <463D63D8.8010901@interia.pl> <463D9E8E.8040500@interia.pl> <463DAD29.20004@interia.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: Wander Winkelhorst , David Johnson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk >> Well. You have very good CPU - 4,4W typical and 6,0W is a factory maximum. > > Says who? TM5800 draws around 2.0W (or even less) when idle [333 MHz]. :) > Though it has a different hardware engine than most x86. Datasheet. It says that Your CPU needs 4,4W (typical) when 100% busy. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NIE KUPUJ!!! ...zanim nie porownasz cen >> http://link.interia.pl/f1a5e