From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?BERTRAND_Jo=EBl?= Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 10:07:58 +0000 Subject: Re: [2.6.21.1] Nat trouble Message-Id: <46404BFE.3030109@systella.fr> List-Id: References: <463F1417.80409@systella.fr> In-Reply-To: <463F1417.80409@systella.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org David Miller a =E9crit : > From: BERTRAND_Jo=EBl > Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 13:57:11 +0200 >=20 >> Hello, >> >> I have built a 2.6.21.1 kernel to replace a working 2.6.20 on an=20 >> U60/SMP. NAT (iptables) worked fine with 2.6.20 but not with 2.6.21.1.=20 >> That being said, all other iptables rules seem to works fine with 2.6.21= .1. >> >> My /var/lib/iptables/active script : >=20 > Please report this to the netfilter developer lists, this doesn't > look sparc specific. >=20 > Please also make sure you have all the proper netfilter modules > enabled in your kernel config, some things have changed in the > past few releases. For example, the connection tracking modules > are called "NF_FOO" instead of "IP_FOO" I have all conntrack modules (and modules are loaded). I have some=20 trouble a long time ago with conntrack modules with iproute2. I don't=20 have any i386 nor amd64 to test on these architectures. Regards, JKB