All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Paul Sokolovsky <pmiscml@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 15:29:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4640F9C4.8050804@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.0.99.0705081510370.25865@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

David Rientjes wrote:
> It is analogous with a sequence point for ia64.  But, as you mentioned, it 
> is ia64 specific so your comment about "asm volatile" constructs not being 
> reordered is always appropriate outside of ia64 specific code but may not 
> apply to ia64 if we ever compiled with -mvolatile-asm-stop.  If we do not
> compile with that option, the behavior is unspecified.  I don't think 
> we'll be adding -mvolatile-asm-stop support any time soon so your warning 
> certainly is appropriate for all code at this time.
>   

Sounds like it's referring to micro-architectural reordering, which is
distinct from compiler reordering.  In other words, even if you
specified "-mvolatile-asm-stop" I would assume that the compiler could
still reorder the asm statements.  Am I right, or should I read more
into the manual description than it actually says?

    J

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-08 22:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-01  5:08 [RFC, PATCH 2/4] SoC base drivers: ASIC3 SoC hardware definitions Paul Sokolovsky
2007-05-01  6:56 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-01 10:27   ` Alan Cox
2007-05-01 12:04     ` Paul Sokolovsky
2007-05-01 12:21       ` Jamey Hicks
2007-05-08 19:14   ` [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil Randy Dunlap
2007-05-08 19:18     ` David Rientjes
2007-05-08 20:00       ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-05-08 20:20         ` David Rientjes
2007-05-08 23:13           ` Randy Dunlap
2007-05-08 23:54             ` David Rientjes
2007-05-09  0:00               ` Randy Dunlap
2007-05-08 21:05         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-08 21:10           ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-05-08 21:16           ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-08 21:26             ` Randy Dunlap
2007-05-08 21:25               ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-08 21:20       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-08 21:27         ` David Rientjes
2007-05-08 21:37           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-08 21:59             ` David Rientjes
2007-05-08 22:04               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-08 22:19                 ` David Rientjes
2007-05-08 22:29                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2007-05-08 22:35                     ` David Rientjes
2007-05-08 23:09           ` Randy Dunlap
2007-05-08 21:29         ` Randy Dunlap
2007-05-08 20:07     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-08 23:34       ` [PATCH] " Randy Dunlap
2007-05-09  0:06         ` David Rientjes
2007-05-09  2:08           ` Randy Dunlap
2007-05-09  2:38             ` David Rientjes
2007-05-09  3:15               ` Randy Dunlap
2007-05-09  9:21               ` Alan Cox
2007-05-09  9:26                 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-09 13:31                   ` Alan Cox
2007-05-09 10:25                 ` David Rientjes
2007-05-09 13:36                   ` Alan Cox
2007-05-09 18:41                     ` David Rientjes
2007-05-09 20:23                       ` Alan Cox
2007-05-09 20:25                         ` David Rientjes
2007-05-09 22:47                         ` Rob Landley
2007-05-09  8:50         ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-09 15:52           ` Randy Dunlap
2007-05-09 19:04             ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-09  1:47     ` [RFC/PATCH] " Jonathan Corbet
2007-05-09  9:43       ` Johannes Stezenbach
2007-05-09 19:34         ` Satyam Sharma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4640F9C4.8050804@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmiscml@gmail.com \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.