From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [62.27.45.185] (helo=argo.arachnion.zzZZzz.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1HljWB-0004J7-UM for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 09 May 2007 12:35:36 +0200 Received: from pd9539108.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.83.145.8]) by argo.arachnion.zzZZzz.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.42) id 1HljUX-00034Y-Gi for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 09 May 2007 12:33:53 +0200 Message-ID: <4641A311.4030907@klever.net> Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 12:31:45 +0200 From: Michael Krelin User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070321) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <464130FC.7030008@gmail.com> <02827798.20070509123821@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <02827798.20070509123821@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.3.0 Subject: Re: QA for intentionally unpackaged files X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 10:35:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >> UNSHIPPED = "${libdir}/libpython2.4.so ${bindir}/smtpd.py" #reason why >> not package/ship it > > Who exactly will go over all recipes and add such lines? I take it the proposal was that package maintainers should take care of it. Indeed, it would be better if intentionally unpackaged files invoked no QA notice. But I think the solution is either not install them or rm them after installation, depending on installation procedure nature. Love, H