All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@mailshack.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	"Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@gmail.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPar>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86 setup rewrite tree ready for flamage^W review
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:48:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4643A128.30302@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070510220406.GA21110@mailshack.com>

Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 11:08:10AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> As far as I could tell, "scan" simply caused the nonstandard video
>> driver scan modules (unsafe probes) to be invoked.  Since those modules
>> are no longer present, there appeared to be no need for them.  The VGA
>> and VESA probes are safe.
> 
> It doesn't probe the hardware in dangerous ways. (Search for mode_scan
> in video.S) It works by trying to set a mode via the normal
> AH=0/AL=mode/int 0x10 method for all possible values of mode. It then
> checks if the bios reports the new mode as being set and reads a few
> standard vga registers to determine if it is a text mode. It's
> completely independent of the CONFIG_VIDEO_SVGA stuff.

It's dangerous, all right (which is why it doesn't do it by default),
since you have no guarantee that the BIOS doesn't totally vomit on these
calls -- or, like my laptop, take about a minute before giving up
finding nothing.

Anyway, I re-implemented scanning and pushed it out to the git tree;
please try it out as it does absolutely nothing on any of my machines.

> That makes me wonder: (from arch/i386/boot/pmjump.S)
> 
> 37         movw    $__BOOT_DS, %cx
> 38 
> 39         movl    %cr0, %edx
> 40         orb     $1, %dl                 # Protected mode (PE) bit
> 41         movl    %edx, %cr0
> 42
> 43         movw    %cx, %ds
> 44         movw    %cx, %es
> 45         movw    %cx, %fs
> 46         movw    %cx, %gs
> 47         movw    %cx, %ss
> 48
> 49         # Jump to the 32-bit entrypoint
> 50         .byte   0x66, 0xea              # ljmpl opcode
> 51 2:      .long   0                       # offset
> 52         .word   __BOOT_CS               # segment
> 
> I thought the 32-bit jump was required to come before the segment loads.
> Does this code load values from the gdt, or are they just loaded as real
> mode segments? As long as it does not crash it does not matter, because
> head.S reloads them again.

Once CR0.PE is set, segments are loaded from the GDT.

	-hpa

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-10 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-09  5:15 x86 setup rewrite tree ready for flamage^W review H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-09  6:51 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-09  7:02   ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-09  8:11     ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-10 14:10 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2007-05-10 18:08   ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-10 18:38     ` Martin Mares
2007-05-11  0:55       ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-10 22:04     ` Alexander van Heukelum
2007-05-10 22:48       ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2007-05-12 12:21         ` Alexander van Heukelum
2007-05-12 14:20           ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-12 18:09             ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-12 18:35               ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-12 18:59                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-12 22:04                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-12 22:08                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-11  4:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-05-11 23:58 ` Kevin Winchester
2007-05-12  0:23   ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-13  0:35     ` Kevin Winchester
2007-05-15 20:45     ` Rob Landley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4643A128.30302@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPar \
    --cc=Matt_Domsch@dell.com \
    --cc=adaplas@gmail.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=heukelum@mailshack.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.