All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
To: "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明" <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6] [IPV6]: Restore semantics of Routing Header processing.
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 15:06:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4644BECE.70508@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070512.011718.121506964.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>

Hi Yoshifuji-san

YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
> The "fix" for emerging security threats was overkill and it broke
> basic semantic of IPv6 routing header processing.  We should assume
> RT0 (or even RT2, depends on configuration) as "unknown" RH type so
> that we
> - silently ignore the routing header if segleft == 0,
> - or, send ICMPv6 Parameter Problem message back to the sender,
>   otherwise.

Aren't we jumping the gun a little here...

Things still are not exactly clear in the IPv6 working group.
Especially the whole segleft == 0 thing is another item that
we might have to fix eventually.

-vlad


> 
> Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
> ---
>  net/ipv6/exthdrs.c |   47 ++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
>  1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/exthdrs.c b/net/ipv6/exthdrs.c
> index 14be0b9..05e9bb5 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/exthdrs.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/exthdrs.c
> @@ -371,22 +371,13 @@ static int ipv6_rthdr_rcv(struct sk_buff **skbp)
>  	struct rt0_hdr *rthdr;
>  	int accept_source_route = ipv6_devconf.accept_source_route;
>  
> -	if (accept_source_route < 0 ||
> -	    ((idev = in6_dev_get(skb->dev)) == NULL)) {
> -		kfree_skb(skb);
> -		return -1;
> -	}
> -	if (idev->cnf.accept_source_route < 0) {
> +	idev = in6_dev_get(skb->dev);
> +	if (idev) {
> +		if (accept_source_route > idev->cnf.accept_source_route)
> +			accept_source_route = idev->cnf.accept_source_route;
>  		in6_dev_put(idev);
> -		kfree_skb(skb);
> -		return -1;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (accept_source_route > idev->cnf.accept_source_route)
> -		accept_source_route = idev->cnf.accept_source_route;
> -
> -	in6_dev_put(idev);
> -
>  	if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, skb_transport_offset(skb) + 8) ||
>  	    !pskb_may_pull(skb, (skb_transport_offset(skb) +
>  				 ((skb_transport_header(skb)[1] + 1) << 3)))) {
> @@ -398,24 +389,6 @@ static int ipv6_rthdr_rcv(struct sk_buff **skbp)
>  
>  	hdr = (struct ipv6_rt_hdr *)skb_transport_header(skb);
>  
> -	switch (hdr->type) {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_MIP6
> -	case IPV6_SRCRT_TYPE_2:
> -		break;
> -#endif
> -	case IPV6_SRCRT_TYPE_0:
> -		if (accept_source_route > 0)
> -			break;
> -		kfree_skb(skb);
> -		return -1;
> -	default:
> -		IP6_INC_STATS_BH(ip6_dst_idev(skb->dst),
> -				 IPSTATS_MIB_INHDRERRORS);
> -		icmpv6_param_prob(skb, ICMPV6_HDR_FIELD,
> -				  (&hdr->type) - skb_network_header(skb));
> -		return -1;
> -	}
> -
>  	if (ipv6_addr_is_multicast(&ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr) ||
>  	    skb->pkt_type != PACKET_HOST) {
>  		IP6_INC_STATS_BH(ip6_dst_idev(skb->dst),
> @@ -454,6 +427,8 @@ looped_back:
>  
>  	switch (hdr->type) {
>  	case IPV6_SRCRT_TYPE_0:
> +		if (accept_source_route <= 0)
> +			goto unknown_rh;
>  		if (hdr->hdrlen & 0x01) {
>  			IP6_INC_STATS_BH(ip6_dst_idev(skb->dst),
>  					 IPSTATS_MIB_INHDRERRORS);
> @@ -465,6 +440,8 @@ looped_back:
>  		break;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_MIP6
>  	case IPV6_SRCRT_TYPE_2:
> +		if (accept_source_route < 0)
> +			goto unknown_rh;
>  		/* Silently discard invalid RTH type 2 */
>  		if (hdr->hdrlen != 2 || hdr->segments_left != 1) {
>  			IP6_INC_STATS_BH(ip6_dst_idev(skb->dst),
> @@ -474,6 +451,8 @@ looped_back:
>  		}
>  		break;
>  #endif
> +	default:
> +		goto unknown_rh;
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -577,6 +556,12 @@ looped_back:
>  	skb_push(skb, skb->data - skb_network_header(skb));
>  	dst_input(skb);
>  	return -1;
> +
> +unknown_rh:
> +	IP6_INC_STATS_BH(ip6_dst_idev(skb->dst), IPSTATS_MIB_INHDRERRORS);
> +	icmpv6_param_prob(skb, ICMPV6_HDR_FIELD,
> +			  (&hdr->type) - skb_network_header(skb));
> +	return -1;
>  }
>  
>  static struct inet6_protocol rthdr_protocol = {


      reply	other threads:[~2007-05-11 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-11 16:17 [PATCH net-2.6] [IPV6]: Restore semantics of Routing Header processing YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2007-05-11 19:06 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4644BECE.70508@hp.com \
    --to=vladislav.yasevich@hp.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.