From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by pobox.fab.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l4E8apSA000643 for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 04:36:52 -0400 Message-ID: <46481E32.4060808@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 09:30:42 +0100 From: "Bryn M. Reeves" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM on SATA/PATA disks References: <464672A6.3000408@davidb.org> In-Reply-To: <464672A6.3000408@davidb.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: LVM general discussion and development -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Brown wrote: > Of course, any of the re-ordering (SCSI TCQ, or SATA NCQ) requires > filesystem and driver support of write barriers for reliability. > Write barriers are not implement in DM, hence LVM, so there is a Only the dm-mpath and dm-snap targets treat barrier bios specially (they return EOPNOTSUPP). Other dm targets pass the barriers on to the underlying devices unchanged. Regards, Bryn. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGSB4y6YSQoMYUY94RApajAJ4kyrw+DDEjj3WiXPOysO5J6KKmOQCgxC0M oQrw2KA74j+ytiKFoMLPQdg= =CZvy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----