From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use $Id$ as the ident attribute keyword rather than $ident$ to be consistent with other VCSs Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:19:18 +0200 Organization: eudaptics software gmbh Message-ID: <46486FE6.16A82D9A@eudaptics.com> References: <200705141429.58412.andyparkins@gmail.com> <200705141437.25528.andyparkins@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 14 16:19:14 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HnbOL-0007gb-Ol for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 14 May 2007 16:19:14 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754094AbXENOTH (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2007 10:19:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754520AbXENOTH (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2007 10:19:07 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:50859 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754113AbXENOTF (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2007 10:19:05 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HnbO7-0006Ky-Nv for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 14 May 2007 16:18:59 +0200 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 16:18:59 +0200 Received: from J.Sixt by cm56-163-160.liwest.at with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 16:18:59 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm56-163-160.liwest.at X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Andy Parkins wrote: > I think that bzr uses $Id$; Mercurial has examples hooks for $Id$; > monotone has $Id$ on its wishlist. I can't think of a good reason not > to stick with the de-facto standard and call ours $Id$ instead of > $ident$. I very much agree. I wondered why it was named $ident$ in the first place. Now that I'm not alone, I thought I'd throw my 2 cents in... -- Hannes