From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 13:48:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4648CB33.3060407@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070514133745.5bfc34ac.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Confused. This patch conflicts a lot with James's one (which I named
> voyager-fix-build-broken-by-shift-to-smp_ops.patch).
>
> If your "i386: move common parts of smp into their own file" also fixes
> Voyager and is preferred then cool, but a) the changelog should tell us
> that and b) could James please test it?
>
The first version of the patch did both, which I guess is the one you've
got. The one I just sent has no Voyager pieces, and has a
Voyager-specific companion patch, which is the basis of the one that
James posted (with pieces of this patch pasted into it).
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-14 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-14 16:08 [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops James Bottomley
2007-05-14 17:10 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-14 17:22 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-14 19:03 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-14 20:09 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-14 19:59 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 20:02 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-14 20:37 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 20:48 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2007-05-14 20:54 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-14 21:05 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 21:08 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-14 21:10 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-14 21:51 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 22:00 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-14 22:27 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-14 22:55 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-14 21:58 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-14 22:29 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 22:40 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-14 22:42 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-14 22:57 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4648CB33.3060407@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.