All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: filesystem benchmarking fun
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 15:12:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <464B57B7.7090404@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0705162010370.9019@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On May 16 2007 10:42, Chris Mason wrote:
>> For example, I'll pick on xfs for a minute.  compilebench shows the
>> default FS you get from mkfs.xfs is pretty slow for untarring a bunch of
>> kernel trees.
> 
> I suppose you used 'nobarrier'? [ http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/5/19/33 ]

Shouldn't that option be renamed to 'corrupt_my_data'?  ;-)

	Jeff




  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-16 19:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-16 14:42 filesystem benchmarking fun Chris Mason
2007-05-16 16:01 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-05-16 17:11   ` Chris Mason
2007-05-16 18:25     ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-16 19:13       ` Chris Mason
2007-05-16 19:33         ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-16 19:53           ` Chris Mason
2007-05-16 20:04             ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-16 20:14               ` Chris Mason
2007-05-16 20:37                 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-16 21:02                   ` Chris Mason
2007-05-24 17:29                     ` Vara Prasad
2007-05-22 16:35                   ` Chris Mason
2007-05-22 17:50                     ` John Stoffel
2007-05-22 18:12                       ` Chris Mason
2007-05-22 18:21                     ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-22 18:39                       ` Chris Mason
2007-05-22 21:25                       ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-25  7:14                         ` Jens Axboe
2007-05-16 18:12 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-16 19:12   ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-05-16 19:16     ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2007-05-16 19:21       ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-18  3:32     ` Eric Sandeen
2007-05-16 19:25   ` Chris Mason
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-16 21:01 Al Boldi
2007-05-17 11:52 Xu CanHao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=464B57B7.7090404@garzik.org \
    --to=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.