From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>,
Francesco Pretto <ceztko@gmail.com>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>,
hmh@hmh.eng.br, pkg-sysvinit-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: remove libata.spindown_compat
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 20:58:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <464CFA42.3080907@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <464C6A0E.7020601@gmail.com>
Tejun Heo wrote:
> With STANDBYDOWN tracking added, libata.spindown_compat isn't
> necessary anymore. If userspace shutdown(8) issues STANDBYNOW, libata
> warns. If userspace shutdown(8) doesn't issue STANDBYNOW, libata does
> the right thing. Userspace can tell whether kernel supports spindown
> by testing whether sysfs node manage_start_stop exists as before.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> As many distros don't do anything to libata devices on shutdown which
> means we can avoid a lot of trouble by tracking spindown status (done)
> and which, in turn, obsoletes libata.spindown_compat. I should have
> researched better before staring this mess. Sorry but the situation
> is much better now. :-)
>
> I'll attach the updated version of http://linux-ata.org/shutdown.html
> as a reply to this mail.
>
> If you find any problem in the updated scheme, please let me know.
>
> Thanks.
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> index 498ff31..5c8695a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> @@ -328,21 +328,20 @@ Who: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
>
> ---------------------------
>
> -What: libata.spindown_compat module parameter
> +What: libata spindown skipping and warning
> When: Dec 2008
> -Why: halt(8) synchronizes caches for and spins down libata disks
> - because libata didn't use to spin down disk on system halt
> - (only synchronized caches).
> - Spin down on system halt is now implemented and can be tested
> - using sysfs node /sys/class/scsi_disk/h:c:i:l/manage_start_stop.
> +Why: Some halt(8) implementations synchronize caches for and spin
> + down libata disks because libata didn't use to spin down disk on
> + system halt (only synchronized caches).
> + Spin down on system halt is now implemented. sysfs node
> + /sys/class/scsi_disk/h:c:i:l/manage_start_stop is present if
> + spin down support is available.
> Because issuing spin down command to an already spun down disk
> - makes some disks spin up just to spin down again, the old
> - behavior needs to be maintained till userspace tool is updated
> - to check the sysfs node and not to spin down disks with the
> - node set to one.
> - This module parameter is to give userspace tool the time to
> - get updated and should be removed after userspace is
> - reasonably updated.
> + makes some disks spin up just to spin down again, libata tracks
> + device spindown status to skip the extra spindown command and
> + warn about it.
> + This is to give userspace tools the time to get updated and will
> + be removed after userspace is reasonably updated.
> Who: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
>
> ---------------------------
applied
you forgot diffstat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-18 0:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-17 14:43 [PATCH] libata: remove libata.spindown_compat Tejun Heo
2007-05-17 14:54 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-18 0:58 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-05-19 11:06 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2007-05-19 11:14 ` [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] " Tejun Heo
2007-05-19 13:48 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-05-19 16:47 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=464CFA42.3080907@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=ceztko@gmail.com \
--cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pkg-sysvinit-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.