From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix e100 rx path on ARM (was [PATCH] e100 rx: or s and el bits) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 21:54:23 -0400 Message-ID: <464D074F.20400@pobox.com> References: <200705011124.l41BOEG4007662@sullivan.realtime.net> <46375664.8030701@roinet.com> <4638F2B2.2000103@roinet.com> <463BA906.30205@roinet.com> <85f07fc58d5ed2147d5214d0f0b4fe32@bga.com> <4648A9DF.6030001@roinet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Milton Miller , e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Jeff Kirsher , John Ronciak , Jesse Brandeburg , Scott Feldman , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Acker , Auke Kok Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:44104 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755362AbXERByu (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2007 21:54:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4648A9DF.6030001@roinet.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Can you resend against the latest kernel (2.6.22-rc1)? And what does Intel think? Jeff