Re: [PATCH 5/5] PCI fixes for the MPC8641 Rev 2.0 silicon and Rev 1.02hardware

[Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>]

Scott Wood wrote:

> That's your model.  Mine involves merging a fragment that corresponds to 
> an active hwoption, with no complex conditional evaluation or deletion 
> of anything from the main tree.

I think my model (which is also Jon's, I think) is easier to read and implement.

> How would you express the alternate setting of phy_type in a subtractive 
> model?  You can't have two nodes with the same name and different 
> phy_types, and you can't have two phy_type properties in one node.

The conditionals would have to be correct:


phy-node [ if j22 = on ]
{
	phy-type = 1
}

phy-node [ if j22 = off ]
{
	phy-type = 2
}

Obviously, j22 can be either on or off, but never both.  If the DTS is coded incorrectly, 
then it will have problems, but I think that's a fair trade-off for the easier implementation.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale