Re: [PATCH] make grub2 compile with libc-less crosscompilers

[Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>]

Yoshinori K. Okuji schrieb:
> On Saturday 19 May 2007 17:30, Patrick Georgi wrote:
>   
>> the target compiler that link libc (and potentially even more libs) -
>> which don't exist in my configuration.
>> As those are not necessary, I decided to modify grub2 instead of messing
>> around even more with the not-so-nice gcc build system.
>>     
>
> They are necessary. Otherwise, you cannot make a core image, for example. 
>   
uhm. where do you expect a target compiled file (ie. one that's run at 
boot time) to use libc?

I'm _not_ talking about the host compiler - here everything works fine, 
after all, there's no linker abuse going on there, just the average 
compile+link process.
> Also, without grub-emu, how do you plan to debug GRUB?
>   
qemu - the portions I work on need it anyway
> BTW I can hardly believe that it is so difficult to use gnu build tools on 
> solaris. Otherwise, how are opensolaris developers building GRUB?
>   
Compiling gcc 4.2 (or 4.1.2) with gnu as and gnu ld in the back end 
resulted in compile errors here, when I tried to do a "normal" build.

The grub (0.95 btw!) in the OpenSolaris tree features a parallel 
makefile hierarchy that uses /usr/sfw/bin/gcc (which uses Sun tools in 
the back end) and, it seems, manual invocations of gnu ld.
so here you are - they basically link by hand


Regards,
Patrick Georgi