From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Sat, 19 May 2007 20:01:49 +0100 (BST) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([216.148.227.153]:45448 "EHLO rwcrmhc13.comcast.net") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20024074AbXESTBr (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 May 2007 20:01:47 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.4] (c-76-106-119-205.hsd1.md.comcast.net[76.106.119.205]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20070519190134m13007ui6oe>; Sat, 19 May 2007 19:01:40 +0000 Message-ID: <464F498D.4070205@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 15:01:33 -0400 From: Kumba User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: post@pfrst.de CC: Giuseppe Sacco , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: R1000 status References: <49027.193.253.35.188.1179557496.squirrel@eppesuigoccas.homedns.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 15089 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: kumba@gentoo.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips peter fuerst wrote: > > Hello, > > yes, the GCC-patches should do the trick. And without a significant > performance decrease, as i was told in the latest success-report (see > http://sgi.sedlacek.biz/). > > kind regards Interesting, I'm curious to see this guy's patches to see what he does different for the IP32 R10K stuff. Whether it's the same thing I did (mod IP28 patches and build w/ gcc cache barriers on load and store ops), or if he went an extra step and added code to protect the scsi and networking drivers. --Kumba -- Gentoo/MIPS Team Lead "Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: small hands do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are elsewhere." --Elrond