All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Linux Kernel M/L <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Scheduler smoothness and fairness - results and package
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 10:27:59 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4652FDEF.8060209@tmr.com> (raw)

Thanks to the suggestions of several people and some encouragement, I've 
done another upgrade of the schedular characteristic package glitch1. 
For "bottom line" folks, the results are at
	http://www.tmr.com/~davidsen/sched_smooth_03.html

This package runs four fast scrolling xterms and a copy of glxgears to 
produce both screen update and CPU load. In addition to the human 
observation of smoothness, the glxgears speeds are characterized by 
variance from sample to sample, and the number of random numbers 
generated by the xterm programs are also characterized.

Changes:

- Reruns for a given configuration are shown in a single row.
- The analysis has had minor output format and statistical tweaks for 
correctness as well as handling of multiple run output in a single row.
- the glxgears 1st value is shown as a separate item, since there is a 
large stoppage on the first sample after cold boot with some schedulers.

The full source and doc is now available from
	http://www.tmr.com/~public/source/
so people can do their own runs. Note that values between different 
machines are almost certainly not meaningful.

Having run all this on a dual core Core2duo in x86 (32 bit) mode, I'm 
now off to rerun in x86_64 mode, and on a single CPU hyperthreaded 
machine, and a pure uniprocessor. I'm going to create a page for all the 
results in one place for anyone who cares.

-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
   "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot

                 reply	other threads:[~2007-05-22 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4652FDEF.8060209@tmr.com \
    --to=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.