From: Mark Huth <mhuth@mvista.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][af_key]pfkey_add: Optimize SA adds and algorithm probes
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 17:15:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46562AA2.8030102@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070518212148.GA25363@gondor.apana.org.au>
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 02:34:12PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> Actually, I think we should just probe for the specific algorithm
>> requested rather than everything. See patch below.
>
> Doh, forgot to actually remove the probe call :)
>
> [IPSEC] pfkey: Load specific algorithm in pfkey_add rather than all
>
> This is a natural extension of the changeset
>
> [XFRM]: Probe selected algorithm only.
>
> which only removed the probe call for xfrm_user. This patch does exactly
> the same thing for af_key. In other words, we load the algorithm requested
> by the user rather than everything when adding xfrm states in af_key.
>
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
>
> Cheers,
[... snip]
Herbert,
I can verify that this works. The test adds 2000 instances of SAs using
hmac-md5 for authentication and rijndael-cbc for encryption.
Test output is:
root@192.168.150.94:~# lsmod
Module Size Used by
root@192.168.150.94:~#time setkey -f SA_test.txt
real 0m1.072s
user 0m0.048s
sys 0m0.632s
root@192.168.150.94:~#lsmod
Module Size Used by
twofish 10112 0
twofish_common 40192 1 twofish
camellia 32768 0
serpent 25216 0
blowfish 9984 0
ecb 3712 0
aes 28864 2000
xcbc 5768 0
sha256 12416 0
crypto_null 3456 0
root@192.168.150.94:~#
Prior to the patch time was over 42 seconds (possibly longer on 2.6.21).
I'm a bit curious why all of the crypto modules got loaded, but it
doesn't matter.
Thanks for the patch.
Mark Huth
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-25 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-11 1:56 [PATCH][af_key]pfkey_add: Optimize SA adds and algorithm probes Mark Huth
2007-05-18 4:34 ` Herbert Xu
2007-05-18 17:16 ` Mark Huth
2007-05-18 21:21 ` Herbert Xu
2007-05-19 21:21 ` David Miller
2007-05-25 0:15 ` Mark Huth [this message]
2007-05-25 0:20 ` Herbert Xu
2007-05-25 0:36 ` David Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-11 0:59 Mark Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46562AA2.8030102@mvista.com \
--to=mhuth@mvista.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.