From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, andsve@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8536] New: Kernel drops UDP packets silently when reading from certain proc file entries
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 08:50:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4656872C.9000701@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1HrTDQ-0006qu-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
Herbert Xu a écrit :
> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>> It is possible to introduce UDP packet losses by reading
>>> the proc file entry /proc/net/tcp. The really strange thing is that
>>> the error counters for packet drops are not increased.
>
> Please try this patch and let us know if it helps.
>
> [TCPv4]: Improve BH latency in /proc/net/tcp
>
> Currently the code for /proc/net/tcp disable BH while iterating
> over the entire established hash table. Even though we call
> cond_resched_softirq for each entry, we still won't process
> softirq's as regularly as we would otherwise do which results
> in poor performance when the system is loaded near capacity.
>
> This anomaly comes from the 2.4 code where this was all in a
> single function and the local_bh_disable might have made sense
> as a small optimisation.
>
> The cost of each local_bh_disable is so small when compared
> against the increased latency in keeping it disabled over a
> large but mostly empty TCP established hash table that we
> should just move it to the individual read_lock/read_unlock
> calls as we do in inet_diag.
>
But its not really true : cond_resched_softirq() is called for
each bucket in hash table, empty or not.
If this patch really helps, this means cond_resched_softirq()
doesnt work at all and should be fixed, or just zapped as it
is seldom used.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-25 6:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200705241948.l4OJmTAe031670@fire-2.osdl.org>
2007-05-24 19:59 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 8536] New: Kernel drops UDP packets silently when reading from certain proc file entries Andrew Morton
2007-05-25 6:23 ` Herbert Xu
2007-05-25 6:50 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2007-05-25 6:57 ` Herbert Xu
2007-05-25 7:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-05-25 7:17 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4656872C.9000701@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andsve@gmail.com \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.