From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Riccio?= Subject: Re: Xen 3.1 - migration fail / save/restore of PV guests too Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 19:20:12 +0200 Message-ID: <46586C4C.9010308@swisscenter.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi, Okay I see :) I will meanwhile play with 64bit domU migrations then. Thanks a lot for your answer. S=E9bastien Keir Fraser a =E9crit : > On 26/5/07 16:57, "S=E9bastien Riccio" wrote: > > =20 >> I'm currently playing with Xen 3.1 live migration and save/restore fea= tures. >> I tried to migrate and save/restore a 32p domain on a 64 host and both >> fails. >> =20 > > Because of different layouts and sizes of certain structures for 32-bit > versus 64-bit guests, save/restore/migrate currently only works where t= he > domU is the same 'bitness' as your dom0. This restriction does not appl= y to > HVM domUs, only PV domUs. We hope to lift the restriction for Xen 3.1.1. > > 32-on-64 is one of the 'harder' new features in 3.1.0, so it will take = a > little while to beat out the last few bugs and feature regressions! > > -- Keir > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > =20