From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Guy Harris <guy-FrUbXkNCsVf2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: WiMAX extensions
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 10:41:35 -0700
Message-ID: <465B144F.2070403@alum.mit.edu>
References: <50721.65.74.1.247.1178691838.squirrel@webmail.cs.umd.edu> <20070513033218.GL20770@che.ojctech.com> <465B128D.9070904@cs.umd.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <465B128D.9070904-VX+DGZyGJwM3uPMLIKxrzw@public.gmane.org>
Sender: radiotap-admin-rN9S6JXhQ+WXmMXjJBpWqg@public.gmane.org
Errors-To: radiotap-admin-rN9S6JXhQ+WXmMXjJBpWqg@public.gmane.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.ojctech.com/mailman/listinfo/radiotap>,
	<mailto:radiotap-request-rN9S6JXhQ+WXmMXjJBpWqg@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:radiotap-rN9S6JXhQ+WXmMXjJBpWqg@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radiotap-request-rN9S6JXhQ+WXmMXjJBpWqg@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.ojctech.com/mailman/listinfo/radiotap>,
	<mailto:radiotap-request-rN9S6JXhQ+WXmMXjJBpWqg@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.ojctech.com/pipermail/radiotap/>
To: radiotap-rN9S6JXhQ+WXmMXjJBpWqg@public.gmane.org
List-Id: radiotap@radiotap.org

Charles Clancy wrote:

> There would certainly be overlap with 802.11.  However most 
> implementations I've seen seem to prefix the fields with IEEE80211_, so 
> I'd think these would all need to be replicated for 802.16.  I'm not 
> sure the best way to handle it.

Replicated, or renamed, with the old names kept around for source 
compatibility - or with IEEE80211_ and IEEE80216_ names for the same value?