From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.22  - Mission Impossible :-) -
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 08:48:13 -0500
Message-ID: <465ED21D.1060108@cybsft.com>
References: <1170.213.45.135.240.1180481698.squirrel@www.xcon.it>    <1180481835.32594.89.camel@imap.mvista.com> <1261.213.45.135.240.1180482297.squirrel@www.xcon.it>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
To: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@texware.it>
Return-path: <linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from relay00.pair.com ([209.68.5.9]:2982 "HELO relay00.pair.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id S1752183AbXEaNsP (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 31 May 2007 09:48:15 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1261.213.45.135.240.1180482297.squirrel@www.xcon.it>
Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org

Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
>> Why do you need to do this?
> 
> For two reasons:
> 
> 1) For study realtime patch
> 2) For include it into next Ubuntu release
> 
> Ciao,
> Alessio
> 

The study part I can kind of understand, but for both reasons wouldn't
it make more sense to wait until 2.6.22 settles out?

-- 
   kr