From: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: os_dep: Remove conditions with no effects
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 08:49:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4661119.G1Uu3eHz2z@linux.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c87140c6e580b443de5d4abafb7872c8ee3efef.camel@perches.com>
On Sunday, June 6, 2021 7:56:32 AM CEST Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-06-06 at 06:35 +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > Removed conditions with no effects. Detected by Coccinelle.
>
> It's be good if you researched how this came to be and noted it
> in the changelog.
>
> try:
>
> commit dc365d2cc579200bc3752ddb941e046e3a16962c
> Author: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue Mar 16 15:04:11 2021 +0100
>
> staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused code blocks conditioned by never set
> CONFIG_AP_WOWLAN
>
I've just read the commit you pointed out. It seems that the conditions with
no effects came out while removing code that was conditionally compiled by the
unused definition CONFIG_AP_WOWLAN.
However, I don't understand why those "conditions with no effects" have been
left there.
Now I'm not sure of what you asked me to do: should I leave them there as they
are (perhaps because I missed something) or should I explain in my patch that
they were overlooked by commit dc365d2cc579?
Thanks in advance,
Fabio
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-06 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-06 4:35 [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: os_dep: Remove conditions with no effects Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-06-06 5:56 ` Joe Perches
2021-06-06 6:49 ` Fabio M. De Francesco [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4661119.G1Uu3eHz2z@linux.local \
--to=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.