All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
	IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: always use polling SETXFER
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 12:00:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4662E5B3.4020205@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46598350.6030403@gmail.com>

Tejun Heo wrote:
> Several people have reported LITE-ON LTR-48246S detection failed
> because SETXFER fails.  It seems the device raises IRQ too early after
> SETXFER.  This is controller independent.  The same problem has been
> reported for different controllers.
> 
> So, now we have pata_via where the controller raises IRQ before it's
> ready after SETXFER and a device which does similar thing.  This patch
> makes libata always execute SETXFER via polling.  As this only happens
> during EH, performance impact is nil.  Setting ATA_TFLAG_POLLING is
> also moved from issue hot path to ata_dev_set_xfermode() - the only
> place where SETXFER can be issued.
> 
> Note that ATA_TFLAG_POLLING applies only to drivers which implement
> SFF TF interface and use libata HSM.  More advanced controllers ignore
> the flag.  This doesn't matter for this fix as SFF TF controllers are
> the problematic ones.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/ata/libata-core.c |   13 ++++---------
>  drivers/ata/pata_via.c    |   12 ++++++------
>  include/linux/libata.h    |    1 -
>  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

To Linus and Andrew:

After discussion and a minor revision (mostly to the description), I am 
OK with this patch.

At this point, I am only reluctant to push it for 2.6.22 since it is so 
late in the -rc series.

If we have another -rc, I would probably be OK with pushing it for 
2.6.22, otherwise I would prefer to wait for 2.6.23.

Comments solicited, from all involved...

	Jeff



  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-03 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-27 13:10 [PATCH] libata: always use polling SETXFER Tejun Heo
2007-06-03 16:00 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-06-03 17:24   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-06-03 18:45     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-03 18:17   ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-03 19:40   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-04 14:42   ` Alan Cox
2007-06-04 20:34     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-04 20:38       ` Jeff Garzik
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-14  5:33 Tejun Heo
2007-03-14 14:09 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-04-30  0:45 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-25 10:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-25 11:58   ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-25 12:26     ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-25 12:52       ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4662E5B3.4020205@garzik.org \
    --to=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.