From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: 2.6.20.3 to be the next kernel? Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:53:48 -0700 Message-ID: <4664EC5C.7040103@goop.org> References: <1180961068.5786.188.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200706041901.22519.mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> <1181015354.5791.246.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1181015354.5791.246.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: tim.post@netkinetics.net Cc: "Daniel P. Berrange" , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Mark Williamson , Ian Campbell List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Tim Post wrote: > Cool, Virtual Legos :) And congrats on a "not bad" from Linus especially > on such a major introduction, I've seen many people running from vger > with their tail between their legs. > Thanks, but there's a subtle semantic difference between "not bad" and "not too bad". The latter suggests that its actually bad, but not so bad that he'll veto it. "Not bad" would be too much to hope for ;) J