From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH pata-2.6] aec62xx: kill speedproc() method wrapper (take 2) Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 19:15:45 +0400 Message-ID: <46657E21.8090804@ru.mvista.com> References: <200702032309.43867.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> <200702162321.40813.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> <200705242046.14109.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> <200705282244.54862.bzolnier@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([63.81.120.155]:19251 "EHLO imap.sh.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760992AbXFEPOO (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:14:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200705282244.54862.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Hello. Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >>There's no reason to have the speedproc() method wrapper for the two quite >>different chip families, so just get rid of it. >>Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov >>--- >>Tthis version of the patch properly installs the speedproc() method. >>Again, the patch has only been compile tested... > applied after fixing the following trivial reject (not a problem > but I thought I would let you know in case I missed something): Yes, you did. I've also recast the patch killing init_dma() method. Do I need to resend it? > *************** > *** 1,5 **** > /* > - * linux/drivers/ide/pci/aec62xx.c Version 0.23 May 23, 2007 > * > * Copyright (C) 1999-2002 Andre Hedrick > * Copyright (C) 2007 MontaVista Software, Inc. > --- 1,5 ---- > /* > + * linux/drivers/ide/pci/aec62xx.c Version 0.24 May 24, 2007 > * > * Copyright (C) 1999-2002 Andre Hedrick > * Copyright (C) 2007 MontaVista Software, Inc. > > I don't know why but it was: > > linux/drivers/ide/pci/aec62xx.c Version 0.23 Apr 27, 2007 MBR, Sergei