From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lguest-fix-divide-error-implement-sched_clock
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:43:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4665AEE5.7040904@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200706051837.22847.ak@suse.de>
Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> I don't think it's a good idea for the TSC. There are various
> setups where it is unreliable and also often simulators don't
> implement it correctly. And it's always a valuable workaround
> to be able to turn it off.
>
I dug some more into the TSC code, and found some other annoying stuff:
/*
* Make an educated guess if the TSC is trustworthy and synchronized
* over all CPUs.
*/
__cpuinit int unsynchronized_tsc(void)
{
if (!cpu_has_tsc || tsc_unstable)
return 1;
/*
* Intel systems are normally all synchronized.
* Exceptions must mark TSC as unstable:
*/
if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL) {
/* assume multi socket systems are not synchronized: */
if (num_possible_cpus() > 1)
tsc_unstable = 1;
}
return tsc_unstable;
}
That's a vendor check foul. That should be a CPU feature flag.
Looks like there is some work to be done here.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-05 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-22 22:38 lguest broken in 2.6.22-rc1-mm1 Matt Mackall
2007-05-22 23:27 ` Rusty Russell
2007-06-04 17:19 ` lguest rebroken in 2.6.22-rc3-mm1 Matt Mackall
2007-06-04 17:28 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-04 17:46 ` Matt Mackall
2007-06-04 18:12 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-05 2:48 ` Rusty Russell
2007-06-05 10:01 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-05 13:11 ` [PATCH] lguest-fix-divide-error-implement-sched_clock Rusty Russell
2007-06-05 14:24 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-05 16:07 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-05 16:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-06-05 16:37 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-05 17:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-06-05 18:43 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2007-06-05 18:51 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-05 21:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-06-05 21:31 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4665AEE5.7040904@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.