From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 12:46:05 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] new cpu directory
In-Reply-To: <475990.83571.qm@web34408.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <475990.83571.qm@web34408.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <4666F2DD.2070101@freescale.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Dylandrea Young wrote:
> I know Freescale MPC5200, MPC5100 are based on 603e core. But the new 
> MPC5121e chip is based on e300 core. That is what confused me. Should I 
> go with cpu/mpc83xx or cpu/mpc5xxx? Or it doesn't matter since I don't 
> need to touch the files in those two directories?

Kim, maybe we should rename cpu/mpc83xx to cpu/e300 and make it generic to all e300 cores? 
    The alternative is to mix e300 and 603e code in cpu/mpc5xxx.

Are there other 51xx chips with an e300 core?

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale