From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4667AA4D.6070505@domain.hid> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 08:48:45 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7289437c0706060801i299d6881w31cc5ffee3444ace@domain.hid> <1181143109.17978.101.camel@domain.hid> <7289437c0706062254v2a386894oeb498459877d5086@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <7289437c0706062254v2a386894oeb498459877d5086@domain.hid> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig2460B21D66DEAC112220C957" Sender: jan.kiszka@domain.hid Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Cyclictest List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Perrine Martignoni Cc: xenomai-help This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig2460B21D66DEAC112220C957 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Perrine Martignoni wrote: >> Did you double-check that you were not testing Xenomai with the >> "vanilla" cyclictest, ie. the one without libpthread_rt dependencies..= =2E? >> See "ldd cyclictest" when in doubt. >=20 > Yes, I did. I wanted to know performances of cyclictest without Xenomai= to > compare. > And I thought that even with Xenomai in the kernel, I would have the sa= me > result. Then re-read Philippe's comment please. If you want to test average performance, rather use something like lmbenc= h. Jan --------------enig2460B21D66DEAC112220C957 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGZ6pOniDOoMHTA+kRAnF9AJ9uENWieFrvdv1x5cFGIi/1rAA7iQCfTlp8 u48+VRSYrisAsXf4zHpIgL4= =PHbr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig2460B21D66DEAC112220C957--