From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4667CEF2.2050509@domain.hid> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:25:06 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7289437c0706060801i299d6881w31cc5ffee3444ace@domain.hid> <1181143109.17978.101.camel@domain.hid> <7289437c0706062254v2a386894oeb498459877d5086@domain.hid> <4667AA4D.6070505@domain.hid> <7289437c0706070042gf4346ddj1c4ee3ac20a068d2@domain.hid> <4667BBBE.1040405@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4667BBBE.1040405@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Cyclictest List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: xenomai-help Jan Kiszka wrote: > Perrine Martignoni wrote: > >>Ok. I'll do this. >> >>But I don't understand why the same application compiled without any links >>with Xenomai give different results if there is Xenomai in the kernel. > > > [Looking at your numbers again] Hmm, maybe some rounding issue of ticks > due to whatever side-effect of I-pipe. We would first of all need the > usual set of information (.config, involved versions) and also > /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource. Maybe what Perrine is observing is simply the overhead of the I-pipe ? I mean, Linux is Xenomai idle task, so it is acceptable for Linux numbers to be a bit worse than when Xenomai is not running. -- Gilles Chanteperdrix