From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Fehlig Subject: Re: [PATCH][XenAPI] Implement VM.set_VCPUs_at_startup Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:15:24 -0600 Message-ID: <4670889C.603@novell.com> References: <466F20A6.4020100@novell.com> <20070613011143.GB17307@totally.trollied.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070613011143.GB17307@totally.trollied.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: John Levon Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org John Levon wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 04:39:34PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: > > >> This patch implements VM.set_VCPUs_at_startup and VM.set_VCPUs_max >> XenAPI methods in xend. Implementation already exists in XenAPI c-bindings. >> > > I'm a little bit confused by all these patches I'm seeing. It looks like > some basic parts of the 1.0 API still aren't done yet; is that accurate? > Yep, seems to be the case. Many of the class fields/methods defined in the spec are not implemented in xend. Not sure how much the spec and implementation diverge - although quickly finding out as the cim providers consume more of Xen API (hence the patches). > If so, is there an ETA for when xend will be finished and the > documentation completed (it's still very incomplete unfortunately) ? And > will they be backported to the 3.1 branch, or will users need to wait > for the next minor release to get a finished API? > Good questions, unfortunately I'm not the one who can answer :-). Regards, Jim