From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22C=2E_Bergstr=F6m=22?= Subject: Re: ebtables v/s arptables Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:19:23 +0300 Message-ID: <46723D7B.6000700@netsyncro.com> References: <1181755998.2976.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1181837804.2972.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> <467237E5.9020400@netsyncro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org pankaj jain wrote: > On 6/15/07, "C. Bergström" wrote: >> pankaj jain wrote: >> > >> >> >> > Hi Jan, >> > I am sorry I did not get the meaning of last line "And don't top >> post." >> > >> > I would also want to know is there any theoretical limit on number of >> > iptable , ebtable, arptable rules we can set? >> > >> I'm just a lurker, but this link may help. >> >> http://linux.sgms-centre.com/misc/netiquette.php#toppost >> > > Thanks for the Reference. > I think I have got the netiquettes now :) > Another one converted to the dark side ;) ok.. I'm back to read-only.. ./C