From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: xt_gateway 20070605 (kernel) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:15:50 +0200 Message-ID: <4672BB36.2030605@trash.net> References: <46657E13.50106@trash.net> <46727873.20503@ufomechanic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netfilter Developer Mailing List , Amin Azez To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Jun 15 2007 12:30, Amin Azez wrote: > >>>and the neighbour table family is always AF_INET since the >>>match is only registered for AF_INET. >>> >> >>Maybe if I take out these checks, I should restrict the match to FORWARD >>and POSTROUTING? > > > Leaving them in does not cost too much. Thats no reason to keep pointless checks around.