Re: [PATCH] natsemi irq flags

[Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>]

On 06/15/2007 05:17 PM, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> The spinlock irq flags should be a unsigned long to properly support 64 bit

Ouch. Can't we automate checking for that?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
> 
> ---
> 
>  drivers/net/natsemi.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/natsemi.c b/drivers/net/natsemi.c
> index 4cf0d3f..460a087 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/natsemi.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/natsemi.c
> @@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ static ssize_t natsemi_set_dspcfg_workaround(struct device *dev,
>  {
>  	struct netdev_private *np = netdev_priv(to_net_dev(dev));
>  	int new_setting;
> -	u32 flags;
> +	unsigned long flags;
>  
>          /* Find out the new setting */
>          if (!strncmp("on", buf, count - 1) || !strncmp("1", buf, count - 1))
>