From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH] Conntrack SIP Problem Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:34:57 +0200 Message-ID: <46767BF1.9070904@trash.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org To: Jerome Borsboom Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-net-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Jerome Borsboom wrote: > This is a CC of a patch from my discussion on linux-net mailinglist > which may be also appropriate here. It wasn't CCed so I've added linux-net since you've also posted the patch there. > Below is a patch that I had to include on top of Herbert Xu's recent > nat-sip patch to get my SIP setup working: > > [NETFILTER]: sip: Fix RTP address NAT > > My setup is a Fritzbox SIP-client behind a NAT-firewall that talks to a > server on the internet. The first chunk of the patch was not necessary > to get the setup working, but I think it is more correct to include it. > The idea behind it is that DNAT of the the RTP session is only necessary > if the SIP session has been SNATed. The second chunk adds some SIP > messages that must be processed as they contain SDP information in my case. Thanks. They both look OK, but for 2.6.22 I'm only going to add the new message types. I'll queue the first chunk for 2.6.23. Can you please send me a Signed-off-by: line for your patch?