All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: alex@clusterfs.com, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ext4-block-reservation.patch
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:38:06 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46780D76.9040706@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4677F0B3.4050805@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1374 bytes --]



Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In block reservation code while rebalancing the free blocks why are we not 
>> looking at the reservation slots that have no free blocks left.  Rebalancing
>> the free blocks equally across all the reservation slots will make sure
>> we have less chances of failure later when we try to reserve blocks. 
>>
>>
>> I understand that we consider the CPU slot on which reservation failed while
>> rebalancing. But what is preventing considering other CPU slot that might have
>> zero blocks left ?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> +void ext4_rebalance_reservation(struct ext4_reservation_slot *rs, __u64 free)
>> +{
>> +       int i, used_slots = 0;
>> +       __u64 chunk;
>> +
>> +       /* let's know what slots have been used */
>> +       for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++)
> 
> BTW... I think you really want:
> 
>   +       for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> 
> in this and other similar places.
> 
> NR_CPUS is a config-time option that may be much more than your actual
> count of runtime possible CPUs... on ia64 it's 512 by default, for
> example.  That's a lot of pointlessness on a 2, 4 or 8 cpu box :)
> 
> I can whip up a proper patch for current code to send (again)...
> 

This is what i have modified. I am yet to build test it. I am looking at forward porting the
mballoc patches and was planning to send it together.

-aneesh

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-RFC-delayed-allocation-for-ext4.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 8069 bytes --]

>From 12a6e86df40b258c91883b4436a2e2e0d588cda7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:25:45 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] [RFC] delayed allocation for ext4

ext4-block-reservation.patch

this is scalable free space management. every time we
delay allocation of some page, a space (including metadata)
should be reserved

From: Alex Tomas <alex@clusterfs.com>
---
 fs/ext4/balloc.c           |  178 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 fs/ext4/super.c            |    2 +
 include/linux/ext4_fs.h    |    5 +
 include/linux/ext4_fs_sb.h |    5 +
 4 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/balloc.c b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
index edde262..ad3f57c 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
@@ -630,8 +630,10 @@ void ext4_free_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
 		return;
 	}
 	ext4_free_blocks_sb(handle, sb, block, count, &dquot_freed_blocks);
-	if (dquot_freed_blocks)
+	if (dquot_freed_blocks) {
+		ext4_release_blocks(sb, dquot_freed_blocks);
 		DQUOT_FREE_BLOCK(inode, dquot_freed_blocks);
+	}
 	return;
 }
 
@@ -1440,7 +1442,7 @@ ext4_fsblk_t ext4_new_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
 	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi;
 	struct ext4_reserve_window_node *my_rsv = NULL;
 	struct ext4_block_alloc_info *block_i;
-	unsigned short windowsz = 0;
+	unsigned short windowsz = 0, reserved = 0;
 #ifdef EXT4FS_DEBUG
 	static int goal_hits, goal_attempts;
 #endif
@@ -1462,6 +1464,13 @@ ext4_fsblk_t ext4_new_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
 		return 0;
 	}
 
+	if (!(EXT4_I(inode)->i_state & EXT4_STATE_BLOCKS_RESERVED)) {
+		*errp = ext4_reserve_blocks(sb, num);
+		if (*errp)
+			return 0;
+		reserved = num;
+	}
+
 	sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
 	es = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es;
 	ext4_debug("goal=%lu.\n", goal);
@@ -1674,8 +1683,11 @@ out:
 	/*
 	 * Undo the block allocation
 	 */
-	if (!performed_allocation)
+	if (!performed_allocation) {
 		DQUOT_FREE_BLOCK(inode, *count);
+		if (reserved)
+			ext4_release_blocks(sb, reserved);
+	}
 	brelse(bitmap_bh);
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1834,3 +1846,163 @@ unsigned long ext4_bg_num_gdb(struct super_block *sb, int group)
 	return ext4_bg_num_gdb_meta(sb,group);
 
 }
+
+/*
+ * reservation.c contains routines to reserve blocks.
+ * we need this for delayed allocation, otherwise we
+ * could meet -ENOSPC at flush time
+ */
+
+/*
+ * as ->commit_write() where we're going to reserve
+ * non-allocated-yet blocks is well known hotpath,
+ * we have to make it scalable and avoid global
+ * data as much as possible
+ *
+ * there is per-sb array
+ */
+
+struct ext4_reservation_slot {
+	__u64		rs_reserved;
+	spinlock_t	rs_lock;
+} ____cacheline_aligned;
+
+
+int ext4_reserve_local(struct super_block *sb, int blocks)
+{
+	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
+	struct ext4_reservation_slot *rs;
+	int rc = -ENOSPC;
+
+	preempt_disable();
+	rs = sbi->s_reservation_slots + smp_processor_id();
+
+	spin_lock(&rs->rs_lock);
+	if (likely(rs->rs_reserved >= blocks)) {
+		rs->rs_reserved -= blocks;
+		rc = 0;
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&rs->rs_lock);
+
+	preempt_enable();
+	return rc;
+}
+
+
+void ext4_rebalance_reservation(struct ext4_reservation_slot *rs, __u64 free)
+{
+	int i, used_slots = 0;
+	__u64 chunk;
+
+	/* let's know what slots have been used */
+	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
+		if (rs[i].rs_reserved || i == smp_processor_id())
+			used_slots++;
+	}
+
+	/* chunk is a number of block every used
+	 * slot will get. make sure it isn't 0 */
+	chunk = free + used_slots - 1;
+	do_div(chunk, used_slots);
+
+	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
+		if (free < chunk)
+			chunk = free;
+		if (rs[i].rs_reserved || i == smp_processor_id()) {
+			rs[i].rs_reserved = chunk;
+			free -= chunk;
+			BUG_ON(free < 0);
+		}
+	}
+	BUG_ON(free);
+}
+
+int ext4_reserve_global(struct super_block *sb, int blocks)
+{
+	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
+	struct ext4_reservation_slot *rs;
+	int i, rc = -ENOENT;
+	__u64 free = 0;
+
+	rs = sbi->s_reservation_slots;
+
+	/* lock all slots */
+	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
+		spin_lock(&rs[i].rs_lock);
+		free += rs[i].rs_reserved;
+	}
+
+	if (free >= blocks) {
+		free -= blocks;
+		ext4_rebalance_reservation(rs, free);
+		rc = 0;
+	}
+
+	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
+		spin_unlock(&rs[i].rs_lock);
+	}
+
+	return rc;
+}
+
+int ext4_reserve_blocks(struct super_block *sb, int blocks)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	BUG_ON(blocks <= 0);
+
+	ret = ext4_reserve_local(sb, blocks);
+	if (likely(ret == 0))
+		return 0;
+
+	return ext4_reserve_global(sb, blocks);
+}
+
+void ext4_release_blocks(struct super_block *sb, int blocks)
+{
+	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
+	struct ext4_reservation_slot *rs;
+
+	BUG_ON(blocks <= 0);
+
+	preempt_disable();
+	rs = sbi->s_reservation_slots + smp_processor_id();
+
+	spin_lock(&rs->rs_lock);
+	rs->rs_reserved += blocks;
+	spin_unlock(&rs->rs_lock);
+
+	preempt_enable();
+}
+
+int ext4_reserve_init(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
+	struct ext4_reservation_slot *rs;
+	int i;
+
+	rs = percpu_alloc(sizeof(struct ext4_reservation_slot), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (rs == NULL)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	sbi->s_reservation_slots = rs;
+
+	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
+		spin_lock_init(&rs[i].rs_lock);
+		rs[i].rs_reserved = 0;
+	}
+	rs[0].rs_reserved = percpu_counter_sum(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void ext4_reserve_release(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
+	struct ext4_reservation_slot *rs;
+
+	rs = sbi->s_reservation_slots;
+	BUG_ON(sbi->s_reservation_slots == NULL);
+	kfree(sbi->s_reservation_slots);
+	sbi->s_reservation_slots = NULL;
+}
+
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 9013018..8abd919 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -439,6 +439,7 @@ static void ext4_put_super (struct super_block * sb)
 	struct ext4_super_block *es = sbi->s_es;
 	int i;
 
+	ext4_reserve_release(sb);
 	ext4_ext_release(sb);
 	ext4_xattr_put_super(sb);
 	jbd2_journal_destroy(sbi->s_journal);
@@ -1917,6 +1918,7 @@ static int ext4_fill_super (struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
 		"writeback");
 
 	ext4_ext_init(sb);
+	ext4_reserve_init(sb);
 
 	lock_kernel();
 	return 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/ext4_fs.h b/include/linux/ext4_fs.h
index 009dccf..fac942a 100644
--- a/include/linux/ext4_fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/ext4_fs.h
@@ -203,6 +203,7 @@ struct ext4_group_desc
 #define EXT4_STATE_NEW			0x00000002 /* inode is newly created */
 #define EXT4_STATE_XATTR		0x00000004 /* has in-inode xattrs */
 #define EXT4_STATE_NO_EXPAND		0x00000008 /* No space for expansion */
+#define EXT4_STATE_BLOCKS_RESERVED	0x00000010 /* blocks reserved */
 
 /* Used to pass group descriptor data when online resize is done */
 struct ext4_new_group_input {
@@ -901,6 +902,10 @@ extern struct ext4_group_desc * ext4_get_group_desc(struct super_block * sb,
 extern int ext4_should_retry_alloc(struct super_block *sb, int *retries);
 extern void ext4_init_block_alloc_info(struct inode *);
 extern void ext4_rsv_window_add(struct super_block *sb, struct ext4_reserve_window_node *rsv);
+int ext4_reserve_init(struct super_block *sb);
+void ext4_reserve_release(struct super_block *sb);
+void ext4_release_blocks(struct super_block *sb, int blocks);
+int ext4_reserve_blocks(struct super_block *sb, int blocks);
 
 /* dir.c */
 extern int ext4_check_dir_entry(const char *, struct inode *,
diff --git a/include/linux/ext4_fs_sb.h b/include/linux/ext4_fs_sb.h
index c9dc1d7..6923f65 100644
--- a/include/linux/ext4_fs_sb.h
+++ b/include/linux/ext4_fs_sb.h
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
 #endif
 #include <linux/rbtree.h>
 
+struct ext4_reservation_slot;
+
 /*
  * third extended-fs super-block data in memory
  */
@@ -65,6 +67,9 @@ struct ext4_sb_info {
 	struct rb_root s_rsv_window_root;
 	struct ext4_reserve_window_node s_rsv_window_head;
 
+	/* global reservation structures */
+	struct ext4_reservation_slot *s_reservation_slots;
+
 	/* Journaling */
 	struct inode * s_journal_inode;
 	struct journal_s * s_journal;
-- 
1.5.2.2.238.g7cbf2f2-dirty


  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-19 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-19 10:29 ext4-block-reservation.patch Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-06-19 10:42 ` ext4-block-reservation.patch Alex Tomas
2007-06-19 15:05 ` ext4-block-reservation.patch Eric Sandeen
2007-06-19 17:08   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2007-06-19 17:16     ` ext4-block-reservation.patch Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-06-19 22:10     ` ext4-block-reservation.patch Andreas Dilger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46780D76.9040706@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.