Re: mm snapshot broken-out-2007-06-20-10-12.tar.gz uploaded

[Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>]

Bob Picco wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:	[Wed Jun 20 2007, 09:07:11PM EDT]
>> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:51:22 -0400 Bob Picco wrote:
>>
>>> akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:	[Wed Jun 20 2007, 01:14:34PM EDT]
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>> Build breakage. pci_mmcfg_late_init is for i386.
>> then you want CONFIG_X86_32 instead of CONFIG_X86.
>> CONFIG_X86 is set/true for both X86_32 and X86_64.
> Then what I stated within the patch description is incorrect. pci.h which is the
> required include for the declaration is conditionally for CONFIG_X86. So it is
> both I guess?

Yes.

> bob
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bob Picco <bob.picco@hp.com>
>>>
>>>  drivers/acpi/bus.c |    2 ++
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> Index: linux-2.6.22-rc5-mm1/drivers/acpi/bus.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- linux-2.6.22-rc5-mm1.orig/drivers/acpi/bus.c	2007-06-20 14:09:07.000000000 -0400
>>> +++ linux-2.6.22-rc5-mm1/drivers/acpi/bus.c	2007-06-20 20:32:00.000000000 -0400
>>> @@ -757,7 +757,9 @@ static int __init acpi_init(void)
>>>  	result = acpi_bus_init();
>>>  
>>>  	if (!result) {
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
>>>  		pci_mmcfg_late_init();
>>> +#endif
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_LEGACY
>>>  		if (!PM_IS_ACTIVE())
>>>  			pm_active = 1;

-- 
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***