From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <467A5EEA.1020608@domain.hid> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:20:10 +0200 From: Wolfgang Grandegger MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4677B095.3070903@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4677B095.3070903@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] Switch to pci_register_driver List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: xenomai-core Hi Jan, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > > can we just switch over to pci_register_driver in order to avoid > deprecated (and soon removed) pci_module_init? Or do we also need some > wrapper for older 2.4 kernels (latest 2.4 is already aligned with 2.6)? It works with 2.4.25, at least and from my point of view it can be applied. Thanks. Wolfgang. > Jan > > > Index: ksrc/drivers/can/sja1000/rtcan_ixxat_pci.c > =================================================================== > --- ksrc/drivers/can/sja1000/rtcan_ixxat_pci.c (Revision 2609) > +++ ksrc/drivers/can/sja1000/rtcan_ixxat_pci.c (Arbeitskopie) > @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ static struct pci_driver rtcan_ixxat_pci > > static int __init rtcan_ixxat_pci_init(void) > { > - return pci_module_init(&rtcan_ixxat_pci_driver); > + return pci_register_driver(&rtcan_ixxat_pci_driver); > } > > > Index: ksrc/drivers/can/sja1000/rtcan_peak_pci.c > =================================================================== > --- ksrc/drivers/can/sja1000/rtcan_peak_pci.c (Revision 2609) > +++ ksrc/drivers/can/sja1000/rtcan_peak_pci.c (Arbeitskopie) > @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ static struct pci_driver rtcan_peak_pci_ > > static int __init rtcan_peak_pci_init(void) > { > - return pci_module_init(&rtcan_peak_pci_driver); > + return pci_register_driver(&rtcan_peak_pci_driver); > } > > >