All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrei Konovalov <akonovalov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Mohammad Sadegh Sadri <mamsadegh@hotmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Virtex 4 Avnet Mini-Module Networking.
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:18:52 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <467AC10C.4050906@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BAY115-W111D8089A1F12D9A5764AAB2100@phx.gbl>

Mohammad Sadegh Sadri wrote:
> 
> very interesting
> 
> the provided xps project from xapp941 results 230Mbits but your custome system is 83.0Mbits, yes?

yes

> just, are you sure the ppc core has the same core clock frequency in both designs? I mean may be the xapp941 is running at 300MHz but yours at 100MHz. 

both run at 300MHz

> And what about a custom system with 9.1SP2? does that gives the same performance?

haven't tried this yet

> Finally If possible please release the test results for TCP streams. ( 9.1 no SP and 9.1 SP2 )

The TEMAC driver is from EDK 9.1.02 (IOW, SP2).

bitstream made by myself with EDK 9.1.00:
=========================================

root@192.168.119.11:~/netperf-2.4.1/src# ./netperf -l 30 -H 192.168.119.1 -i 10, 2 -I 99,10 -t TCP_STREAM -- -m 32768 -s 262144
TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.119.1 (192.168.119.1) port 0 AF_INET : ±5.0% @ 99% conf.
Recv   Send    Send
Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed
Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput
bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/sec

  87380 217088  32768    30.00      41.66

bitstream from XAPP941:
=======================

root@192.168.119.11:~/netperf-2.4.1/src# ./netperf -l 30 -H 192.168.119.1 -i 10, 2 -I 99,10 -t TCP_STREAM -- -m 32768 -s 262144
TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.119.1 (192.168.119.1) port 0 AF_INET : ±5.0% @ 99% conf.
Recv   Send    Send
Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed
Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput
bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/sec

  87380 217088  32768    30.00     111.86

And I didn't test ML405 receive performance.

Thanks,
Andrei

> thanks
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------
>> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:53:49 +0400
>> From: akonovalov@ru.mvista.com
>> To: mamsadegh@hotmail.com
>> CC: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org; kashiwagi@co-nss.co.jp; glenn.g.hart@us.westinghouse.com
>> Subject: Re: Virtex 4 Avnet Mini-Module Networking.
>>
>> Mohammad Sadegh Sadri wrote:
>>> I'm wondering where are the original developers of TEMAC driver these days, I have not seen any posts from any of andrei
>>> nor grant in the recent weeks. may be they are involved in other projects.
>> As for me - no, not until the end of this week..
>>
>> I am puzzled with the following:
>>
>> I've got ML405 recently. There is a prebuilt bitstream with TEMAC in SGDMA mode for this board made by Xilinx (XAPP941).
>> With the TEMAC driver from EDK 9.1SP2 and the XAPP941 bitstream I've got (no jumbo frames):
>>
>>    XTemac: using sgDMA mode.
>>    XTemac: using TxDRE mode
>>    XTemac: using RxDRE mode
>>    XTemac: buffer descriptor size: 32768 (0x8000)
>>    XTemac: (buffer_descriptor_init) phy: 0x3cf8000, virt: 0xff100000, size: 0x8000
>>    eth%d: XTemac: PHY detected at address 7.
>>    eth0: Xilinx TEMAC #0 at 0x80000000 mapped to 0xC5060000, irq=0
>>    eth0: XTemac id 1.0f, block id 5, type 8
>>
>>    eth0: XTemac: Options: 0xb8f2
>>    eth0: XTemac: We renegotiated the speed to: 1000
>>    eth0: XTemac: speed set to 1000Mb/s
>>    eth0: XTemac: Send Threshold = 16, Receive Threshold = 2
>>    eth0: XTemac: Send Wait bound = 1, Receive Wait bound = 1
>>
>>    root@192.168.119.11:~/netperf-2.4.1/src# ./netperf -l 30 -H 192.168.119.1 -i 10,
>>    2 -I 99,10 -t UDP_STREAM -- -m 32768 -s 262144
>>    UDP UNIDIRECTIONAL SEND TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.11
>>    9.1 (192.168.119.1) port 0 AF_INET : ±5.0% @ 99% conf.
>>    Socket  Message  Elapsed      Messages
>>    Size    Size     Time         Okay Errors   Throughput
>>    bytes   bytes    secs            #      #   10^6bits/sec
>>
>>    217088   32768   30.00       26391      0     230.60
>>    107520           30.00       26377            230.48
>>
>> Not that bad for this setup.
>>
>> With xps (EDK 9.1 without any SPs) I've tried creating exact the same design.
>> So that exact the same kernel etc could be used for the both bitstreams.
>> And with the self-made one I see exact the same output with the only difference:
>>
>>    root@192.168.119.11:~/netperf-2.4.1/src# ./netperf -l 30 -H 192.168.119.1 -i 10,
>>    2 -I 99,10 -t UDP_STREAM -- -m 32768 -s 262144
>>    UDP UNIDIRECTIONAL SEND TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.11
>>    9.1 (192.168.119.1) port 0 AF_INET : ±5.0% @ 99% conf.
>>    Socket  Message  Elapsed      Messages
>>    Size    Size     Time         Okay Errors   Throughput
>>    bytes   bytes    secs            #      #   10^6bits/sec
>>
>>    217088   32768   30.00        9593      0      83.82
>>    107520           30.00        9586             83.76
>>
>> :o(
>>
>> Rebuilding the XAPP941 project with EDK 9.1.00 still leaves 230Mb/sec.
>> I also pulled the additional timing constraints from XAPP941's data/system.ucf
>> into the self-made data/system.ucf, but this haven't change anything.
>>
>> I've run out of ideas, and switched from TEMAC to other Xilinx stuff for a while.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andrei
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger 
> http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=wlmailtagline
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-21 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-21 16:05 Virtex 4 Avnet Mini-Module Networking Mohammad Sadegh Sadri
2007-06-21 18:18 ` Andrei Konovalov [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-22 21:21 Mohammad Sadegh Sadri
2007-06-22 19:02 Glenn.G.Hart
2007-06-19 21:04 Mohammad Sadegh Sadri
2007-06-21 14:53 ` Andrei Konovalov
2007-06-19 18:06 Glenn.G.Hart
2007-06-19 15:21 Glenn.G.Hart
2007-06-19 15:51 ` Yoshio Kashiwagi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=467AC10C.4050906@ru.mvista.com \
    --to=akonovalov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mamsadegh@hotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.