From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752712AbXFVDvh (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 23:51:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750815AbXFVDv3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 23:51:29 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:35243 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750750AbXFVDv3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 23:51:29 -0400 Message-ID: <467B4736.7030303@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 23:51:18 -0400 From: Rik van Riel Organization: Red Hat, Inc User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061008) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?Wm9sdMOhbiBIVUJFUlQ=?= CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Please release a stable kernel Linux 3.0 References: <200706212349.54983.zoltan.hubert@zzaero.com> In-Reply-To: <200706212349.54983.zoltan.hubert@zzaero.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Zoltán HUBERT wrote: > So I feel that a turning-point is coming where a really > really really (x 15) stable and reliable kernel is NEEDED. You are free to create one, or follow Adrian Bunk's 2.6.16.x series. Nobody's stopping you. Oh, 2.6.16 does not have the features you need? You'd be out of luck with a stable/unstable kernel split, since your stable kernel would not have the features... -- Politics is the struggle between those who want to make their country the best in the world, and those who believe it already is. Each group calls the other unpatriotic.