Hi, [just to save this early-Saturday-morning insight] I think the xntimer interface is not yet ready to represent all required scenarios. What kind of timers are there? Let's start with POSIX: 1. Realtime timers - use realtime clock as base, re-tune absolute(!) expiry dates if the realtime clock changes 2. Monotonic timers - use monotonic clock as base, don't re-adjust during runtime Now what we have in current trunk: 3a. Realtime xntimers - use wallclock_offset to calculate absolute expiry dates, don't re-adjust during runtime 4a. Monotonic xntimers - use raw jiffies/TSC as base, don't re-adjust during runtime And this is what we planed to introduce soon: 3b. Realtime xntimers - use wallclock offset to calculate absolute expiry dates, re-adjust if the offset changes during runtime 4b. Monotonic xntimers - same as 4a 3b and 4b almost perfectly match POSIX, one only has to pass relative realtime timers as monotonic ones (Linux does so too). But there are a lot of skins that potentially rely on 3a! At least the whole native skin, I would say. So we may actually need two knobs when starting an xntimer: A) Take wallclock offset into account when calculating internal expiry date? B) Re-tune the expiry date during runtime if the offset changes? Reasonable combinations are none of both ("POSIX monotonic"), A ("Xenomai realtime"), and A+B ("POSIX realtime"). Am I right? Please comment. Moreover, it looks to me like the monotonic API I introduced is not very handy (fortunately, there is no in-tree user yet). It has a sticky property, i.e. you set a persistent flag in the xntimer object if it ought to be monotonic. As xntimer structures are typically also persistent, you easily end up saving the current mode, setting your own, and restoring the old one once the timer fired -- to keep other users of the timer happy. E.g., think of RTDM doing some monotonic timing with a task while the owning skin may prefer realtime mode. I'm almost convinced now that passing a non-sticky mode on each xntimer_start (along with XN_ABSOLUTE/RELATIVE in the same parameter) will be more useful. Jan