From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: Follow packets in rules Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 16:48:44 +0200 Message-ID: <467E844C.6030600@trash.net> References: <466FB176.7040306@netfilter.org> <467020F6.2050906@trash.net> <46713EE8.6060906@trash.net> <46714F7D.4010309@trash.net> <467BDA90.7090802@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org To: Jozsef Kadlecsik Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >> Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote: >> >>> Attached you can find the reworked TRACE target, which does not suffer >>> from backward incompatibility. Unfortunately I had to steal one unused >>> bit from skbuff to be able to mark the packets so that it surely does >>> not clash with any rules using the standard "MARK" target. Logging >>> level, flags and type are hardcoded. What do you think? >> >> >> Could you send me a Signed-off-by: line so I can queue this for 2.6.23? > > > Signed-off-by: Jozsef Kadlecsik Thanks Jozsef, applied. I've also added the missing ip6t_TRACE alias to xt_TRACE.c.