diff for duplicates of <467EDE48.307@trash.net>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index bfca182..17a8f75 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -51,7 +51,3 @@ wouldn't mind adding a new qdisc.
 > * ESFQ is marginally slower than SFQ (although I haven't been able to
 >   measure a practical difference; if someone has benchmark tips I'll try
 >   them).
-_______________________________________________
-LARTC mailing list
-LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
-http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index edc6701..e8669d0 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
  "ref\0467ECB0C.6020105@fatooh.org\0"
  "From\0Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [LARTC] ESFQ: request for user input\0"
- "Date\0Sun, 24 Jun 2007 21:12:40 +0000\0"
+ "Date\0Sun, 24 Jun 2007 23:12:40 +0200\0"
  "To\0Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@fatooh.org>\0"
  "Cc\0lartc <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>"
  " Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>\0"
@@ -59,10 +59,6 @@
  ">   that could potentially introduce bugs.\n"
  "> * ESFQ is marginally slower than SFQ (although I haven't been able to\n"
  ">   measure a practical difference; if someone has benchmark tips I'll try\n"
- ">   them).\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "LARTC mailing list\n"
- "LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl\n"
- http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
+ >   them).
 
-740e745b2c1d3b5b90a55b04d44b016d2b28ade84780f78850ccbda0ac769473
+a02aa57ab73496b630c3f7f1aa153afdcad3cabde2bdab96254fdededc113ef2
