Re: [Xenomai-core] Monotonic, realtime, and other timers

[Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 935 bytes --]

Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> IMO, the only advantage of having absolute timers is to be able to apply
> the posix scheme. So, if I followed correctly your discussion, what we
> need is:
> - an XNTBISOL flag with a service xntbase_isol which set this flag and
>   unshare the target timebase if it is shared (IOW, if aperiodic)
> - the service xntbase_adjust_time to walk all the absolute timers of the
>   non isolated timebases and adjust their expiry date or play their
>   handler the posix way.

Two questions came up here regarding item #2:

 - Shouldn't we also adjust the non-monotonic timers of an isolated base
   if it asks for wallclock tuning? I think so.

 - We don't have a service to walk the list of all pending timers, do
   we? As that touches all of our timer queue variants and I'm not
   familiar with their details (except for plain lists...), I would
   welcome any support on this.

Jan


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 250 bytes --]