From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <468132DC.6010705@domain.hid> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:38:04 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4680F263020000010018F152@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4680F263020000010018F152@domain.hid> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigEB9D83511435C89A322B32BC" Sender: jan.kiszka@domain.hid Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] patch version List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Hubert Talbot Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigEB9D83511435C89A322B32BC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hubert Talbot wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Is it safe to apply patch like adeos-ipipe-2.6.20-i386-1.8-04.patch (27= -May-2007 14:33)=20 > to a newer kernel like linux-2.6.20.14.tar.gz (11-Jun-2007 19:03) or li= nux-2.6.21.5.tar.gz (11-Jun-2007 19:03)? i386-1.8-04 is know to work fine over recent 2.6.20.x kernels. Currently, we have no ipipe support for i386 2.6.21.x or 2.6.22-rcX kernels, but that's work in progress. Alternatively, if you have an x86_64 system, you could already try http://www.rts.uni-hannover.de/rtaddon/patches/ipipe-kernel/x64-playgroun= d/adeos-ipipe-2.6.22-rc5-x86_64-1.0-08.patch (should fit on -rc6 as well, not yet tested though) Jan --------------enigEB9D83511435C89A322B32BC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGgTLcniDOoMHTA+kRAiq+AJwI0Dm/jIC3Pctk0mZlzTKma9dGFgCeL9Hq qMAPjIzTxV2vB1jpBN6Jjso= =7ri3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigEB9D83511435C89A322B32BC--