From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ivan Dubrov Subject: Routing decision after FORWARD Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 20:15:58 +0700 Message-ID: <4682630E.30406@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig61E1BE44BF1945CE600AFEC4" Return-path: DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type; b=odoWgIGGtugMJ0tQgefPyh9s2J/YDYuEbIzHtzrHJcJF4L08+db+JXI9m7OKdk4l8n/9ptu0wwOkYVj4PDas9Ye+lyQ0uhc2vea/bw42XXjv4TeQYPXGhO4nj4b9zGTzatOsMoEY+3LMf3Rdt2+cWzGqCm7ctJ4BlT5HTPqEmHQ= List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig61E1BE44BF1945CE600AFEC4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, Look here: http://iptables-tutorial.frozentux.net/iptables-tutorial.html#TRAVERSINGG= ENERAL According to the diagram, there is routing decision after filter/FORWARD. However, according to the tables before, there is no such routing (there is only one routing before mangle/FORWARD). The question is, which one is correct? --=20 WBR, Ivan S. Dubrov --------------enig61E1BE44BF1945CE600AFEC4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGgmMQLZ+Fnc2HIX4RAsR3AJ9C2hN51hOUreqxSxfVrfzKsYLYkgCfUYeB Iiphlzj778+VhLW79Kf/80w= =qS8a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig61E1BE44BF1945CE600AFEC4--