From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Ford <david@blue-labs.org>
Subject: Re: ipt_account / iptables 1.3.8
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:30:58 -0400
Message-ID: <4682ACE2.8020606@blue-labs.org>
References: <1182962627.16585.6.camel@localhost>
	<4682A981.3090608@plouf.fr.eu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Netfilter Development Mailinglist <netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org>
In-Reply-To: <4682A981.3090608@plouf.fr.eu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> [...]
> AFAIK, the concerned extensions are : fuzzy, nth, random (both
> superseded by statistic), ROUTE, account, BALANCE, childlevel,
> connlimit, dstlimit, FTOS, IPMARK, ipv4options, IPV4OPTSSTRIP, mport,
> NETLINK, osf, psd, record_rpc, rpc, TARPIT, TCPLAG, time, TRACE, u32,
> XOR.

Is there something that functionally replaces TARPIT?