From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.genesi-usa.com (mithrandir.softwarenexus.net [66.98.186.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F522DDEC1 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2007 09:38:24 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <46844692.1040804@genesi-usa.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 00:38:58 +0100 From: Matt Sealey MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: PCI IO range limitation References: <46838B54.2010806@semihalf.com> <1183052634.5521.284.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1183052634.5521.284.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Marian Balakowicz List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 12:20 +0200, Marian Balakowicz wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Trying to change PCI IO window base for 52xx target I found that >> we are pretty much limited to a "0" offset only. > > We just fixed that for 64 bits but 32 bits still has the limitation. > Note that it's not a very good idea to have your IO range at !0 if > you're going to use anything ISA-like, such as a VGA video card or other > legacy devices behind a PCI southbridge or SuperIO. The chances of that on an MPC52xx platform are practically zero, aren't they? -- Matt Sealey Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations